Comments on: Macworld Notes

By: Olivier

Olivier — Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:09:53 +0000

Well, given the pathetic offer for web publishing applications (RealMac Software's RapidWeaver being the only serious one in my opinion) and the dire need for a simple one, it's really no surprise that several companies thought about developing one at the same time.

By: mhenders

mhenders — Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:22:19 +0000

I tried Sandvox, and here’s the impression I had: If you know enough about web development to fill in the blanks in the Sandvox inspector (e.g. your feed URL), then you’re likely the kind of person that would eventually find Sandvox’s capabilities limiting. And if you don’t know enough about web development to really need something like Sandvox, then you probably won’t know how to fill in the blanks in the inspector.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:37:21 +0000

Please consider contacting Apple to see if they’ll honor your wish to get one of the new ‘Books instead of the one you just purchased. Be a pill about it, and you may succeed!

By: Stefan Seiz

Stefan Seiz — Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:27:15 +0000

Since all the Apple Stuff incl. iWeb is always tied to .mac, i believe there’s plenty of room for Sandvox. There must be lot’s of users who want their own domainname (not mac/com/user) and want one click publishing with http://FTP... Once the realitydistortionfield cleared we’ll realize what iWeb realy is.